AQB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cal-Maine Foods has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of 35.87%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat Cal-Maine Foods's return on equity of 50.26%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.69%. On the other hand Cal-Maine Foods has an analysts' consensus of $105.33 which suggests that it could fall by -0.57%. Given that AquaBounty Technologies has higher upside potential than Cal-Maine Foods, analysts believe AquaBounty Technologies is more attractive than Cal-Maine Foods.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 17.958% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cal-Maine Foods has a beta of 0.174, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.562%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cal-Maine Foods offers a yield of 6.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.50 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods pays out 33.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than Cal-Maine Foods quarterly revenues of $1.4B. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of $401.1K is lower than Cal-Maine Foods's net income of $508.5M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cal-Maine Foods's PE ratio is 5.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 2.11x versus 1.36x for Cal-Maine Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limoneira has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of -9.57%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat Limoneira's return on equity of -0.85%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.69%. On the other hand Limoneira has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 79.16%. Given that Limoneira has higher upside potential than AquaBounty Technologies, analysts believe Limoneira is more attractive than AquaBounty Technologies.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 17.958% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limoneira has a beta of 0.435, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.487%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limoneira offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limoneira pays out 76.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Limoneira's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than Limoneira quarterly revenues of $35.1M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of $401.1K is higher than Limoneira's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Limoneira's PE ratio is 39.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 2.11x versus 1.53x for Limoneira. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Village Farms International has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of -8.7%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat Village Farms International's return on equity of -14.13%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.69%. On the other hand Village Farms International has an analysts' consensus of $2.67 which suggests that it could grow by 100.5%. Given that Village Farms International has higher upside potential than AquaBounty Technologies, analysts believe Village Farms International is more attractive than AquaBounty Technologies.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 17.958% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Village Farms International has a beta of 2.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.353%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Village Farms International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Village Farms International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than Village Farms International quarterly revenues of $77.1M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of $401.1K is higher than Village Farms International's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Village Farms International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 2.11x versus 0.44x for Village Farms International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vital Farms has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of 10.42%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat Vital Farms's return on equity of 20.29%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.69%. On the other hand Vital Farms has an analysts' consensus of $45.70 which suggests that it could grow by 22.19%. Given that AquaBounty Technologies has higher upside potential than Vital Farms, analysts believe AquaBounty Technologies is more attractive than Vital Farms.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 17.958% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Farms has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vital Farms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Farms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than Vital Farms quarterly revenues of $162.2M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of $401.1K is lower than Vital Farms's net income of $16.9M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vital Farms's PE ratio is 33.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 2.11x versus 2.75x for Vital Farms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.