APEI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Laureate Education has a net margin of 5.4% compared to American Public Education's net margin of -8.26%. American Public Education's return on equity of 8.27% beat Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.19%.

American Public Education has a consensus price target of $32.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.11%. On the other hand Laureate Education has an analysts' consensus of $24.88 which suggests that it could grow by 2.66%. Given that American Public Education has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe American Public Education is more attractive than Laureate Education.

American Public Education has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.344%.

American Public Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. American Public Education pays 37.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education pays out 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Public Education quarterly revenues are $164.6M, which are smaller than Laureate Education quarterly revenues of $236.2M. American Public Education's net income of $8.9M is higher than Laureate Education's net income of -$19.5M. Notably, American Public Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.04x while Laureate Education's PE ratio is 12.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Public Education is 0.87x versus 2.40x for Laureate Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 5.4% compared to American Public Education's net margin of 1.65%. American Public Education's return on equity of 8.27% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04%.

American Public Education has a consensus price target of $32.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.11%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could grow by 12.47%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than American Public Education, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than American Public Education.

American Public Education has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.42%.

American Public Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Public Education pays 37.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Public Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Public Education quarterly revenues are $164.6M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $117.5M. American Public Education's net income of $8.9M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M. Notably, American Public Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.04x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 58.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Public Education is 0.87x versus 1.56x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grand Canyon Education has a net margin of 5.4% compared to American Public Education's net margin of 24.76%. American Public Education's return on equity of 8.27% beat Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.87%.

American Public Education has a consensus price target of $32.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.11%. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education has an analysts' consensus of $213.33 which suggests that it could grow by 24.16%. Given that Grand Canyon Education has higher upside potential than American Public Education, analysts believe Grand Canyon Education is more attractive than American Public Education.

American Public Education has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.608%.

American Public Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grand Canyon Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Public Education pays 37.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Public Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Public Education quarterly revenues are $164.6M, which are smaller than Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues of $289.3M. American Public Education's net income of $8.9M is lower than Grand Canyon Education's net income of $71.6M. Notably, American Public Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.04x while Grand Canyon Education's PE ratio is 21.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Public Education is 0.87x versus 4.75x for Grand Canyon Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Technical Institute has a net margin of 5.4% compared to American Public Education's net margin of 5.52%. American Public Education's return on equity of 8.27% beat Universal Technical Institute's return on equity of 21.98%.

American Public Education has a consensus price target of $32.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.11%. On the other hand Universal Technical Institute has an analysts' consensus of $37.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.8%. Given that Universal Technical Institute has higher upside potential than American Public Education, analysts believe Universal Technical Institute is more attractive than American Public Education.

American Public Education has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.577, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.703%.

American Public Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Technical Institute offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Public Education pays 37.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Technical Institute pays out 2.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Public Education quarterly revenues are $164.6M, which are smaller than Universal Technical Institute quarterly revenues of $207.4M. American Public Education's net income of $8.9M is lower than Universal Technical Institute's net income of $11.4M. Notably, American Public Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.04x while Universal Technical Institute's PE ratio is 31.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Public Education is 0.87x versus 2.31x for Universal Technical Institute. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.